Notes on the craft of poetry

Further notes on The best american poetics

Mark Strand says:

I believe that all poetry is formal in that it exists within limits, limits that are either inherited by tradition or limits that language itself imposes.

Form it should be remembered is a word that has several meanings, some which are near opposites.

  • form has to do with the structure or outward appearance of something
  • form has to do with essence
  • in poetry structure & essence seem to come together, as do the disposition of words and their meanings

Wallace Stevens said:

While there is nothing automatic about the poem, nevertheless it has an automatic aspect in the sense that it is what I wanted it to be without knowing before it was written what I wanted it to be, even though I knew before it was written what I wanted to do.

The Old Woman and the Statue

Paul Valéry said:

I have … noticed in myself certain states which I may call poetic, since some of them were finally realized in poems. They came about from no apparent cause, arising from some accident or other; they developed according to their own nature, and consequently I found myself for a time jolted out of my habitual state of mind.

Poetry and Abstract Thought

Gaston Bachelard said:

Intellectual criticism of poetry will never lead to the center where poetic images are formed.

… it is generally acknowledged, Strand comments, that poetry invokes aspects of language other than that of communication, most significantly as a variation, though diminished, of a sacred text.

Gustav Jung said:

The work presents us with a finished picture, and this picture is amenable to analysis only to the extent that we can recognize it as a symbol. But if we are unable to discover any symbolic value in it, we have merely established that, so far as we are concerned, it means no more than what it says, or to put it another way, that it is no more than what it seems to be. 

This, Mark Strand comments, strikes me as a generous statement, for it allows poems an existence ultimately tautological.

IMG_4616

Still from film by Nathalie Djurberg

The purpose of the poem is not (as Freud argued) disclosure, storytelling or the telling of a daydream; nor is the poem a symptom. A poem is itself and is the act by which it is born. It is self-referential and is not necessarily preceded by any known order, except that of other poems.

Perhaps the poem is ultimately a metaphor for something unknown, its working-out a means of recovery.

Mark Strand said:

Furthermore, we might say that the degree to which a poem is explained or paraphrased is precisely the degree to which it ceases being a poem. If nothing is left of the poem, it has become the paraphrase of itself, and readers will experience the paraphrase in place of the poem. It is for this reason that poems must exist not only in language but beyond it. 

 

 

From Mark Strand’s The Weather of Words (2000): Notes on the craft of poetry

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s