apropos putting things into words –

Aquabob, clinkerbell, daggler, cancervell, ickle, tankle, shuckle, crottle, doofers, honeyfur, zawn
IMG_0972The English language used to be a rich language, full of vivid, precise words to describe the landscape and natural phenomena. But where are these words nowadays? According to Robert Macfarlane we have not kept up with developing this side of our language, on the contrary we have an impoverished language for landscape. He is worried that  A language in common, a language of the commons, is declining.

Here are some examples of (almost, or soon to be) lost words:

  • a caochan: a slender moor-stream obscured by vegetation such that it is virtually hidden from sight
  • feadan: a small stream running from a moorland loch
  • rionnach maoim: the shadows cast on the moorland by clouds moving across the sky on a bright and windy day
  • spangin: walking vigorously
  • roarie bummlers: fast-moving storm clouds

Words die when we stop using them. But we do also create new ones. Finding the right words, the best words, is a difficult job. Some of us spend most of our days searching for them.

Why should this loss (the loss of words) matter? You can’t even use crizzle as a Scrabble word: there aren’t two “z”s in the bag (unless, of course, you use a blank). It matters because language deficit leads to attention deficit. As we deplete our ability to denote and figure particular aspects of our places, so our competence for understanding and imagining possible relationships with non-human nature is correspondingly depleted.

– Robert Macfarlane

“The hardest thing of all to see is what is really there,” observed JA Baker in The Peregrine (1967), a book that brilliantly shows how such seeing might occur in language. To me there is a parallel here – writing about art and writing about nature are similar activities. As a writer I comprehend, perceive, discern, recognize and understand the world and myself through and with words.

It is of the greatest importance that we keep our language living.

4 Comments Add yours

  1. Thank you for this. I had been thinking on this lately with the removal of nature words from the dictionary…I am still struggling with this idea that ‘broadband’ is deemed to be a more important or more relevant word then “acorn”.

    1. Sigrun says:

      We have to take the words back!

  2. We are losing many of those environments, so it makes a sad kind of sense we would be losing those words.

    1. Sigrun says:

      I can see the logic in that, but in most parts of the world there are still endless areas of wilderness to be named and enjoyed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.