a deeper level of experience –

I do not know how this happened; but suddenly, in the midst of reading about Yoko Ono, I remembered something I have read years ago in the The Birth of Tragedy. It has to do with art and life.


Edvard Munch, Friedrich Nietzsche (1906)

For Nietzsche, art is not just a form of human activity but is rather the highest expression of the human spirit.

… it is only as an aesthetic phenomenon that existence and the world are eternally justified.

Nietzsche criticizes his own age (though his words apply equally to the present day) for being overly rationalistic, for assuming that it is best to treat existence and the world primarily as objects of knowledge. For Nietzsche, this stance makes life meaningless because knowledge and rationality in themselves do nothing to justify existence and the world. Life finds meaning, according to Nietzsche, only through art. Art, music, and tragedy in particular bring us to a deeper level of experience than philosophy and rationality. Existence and the world become meaningful not as objects of knowledge but as artistic experiences.  According to Nietzsche, art does not find a role in the larger context of life, but rather life takes on meaning and significance only as it is expressed in art.

But even if art as a way of living is a concern for Ono, I still feel I have taken on a strange challenge reading Ono in light of Nietzsche. They surely present themselves as a mismatched pair!

– Maybe an interesting idea, maybe not …

ART Philosophy Yoko Ono

Sigrun View All →

sketcher, reader, writer

13 Comments Leave a comment

  1. Sigrun,
    – a very interesting idea indeed. The question whether life takes on meaning only through art or is art one of the many (infinite?) activities in which a meaning may be created/found is for me one of the more interesting queries we can investigate. Thank you for enlivening my morning coffee.

  2. Life DOES take on meaning and significance through art (agreed), but I disagree that it is the only way it takes on meaning. Still it is a fascinating assertion and one I love thinking about because I half way agree.

    However, wonderful post.. 🙂

  3. And Nietzsche was referring to Hölderlin, who was just one of a series of poets chewed up by German rationality. He was pointing out that if German culture surgically removed half of itself, it would self destruct. If he were alive today I think he would defend Yoko in the same way. For her part, Yoko is, as I read it, trying to sidestep the discussion so that a new form of discussion will sidestep the misreadings that dogged Nietzsche.

  4. I think art has a way of touching parts into our psyche that we are unable to ourselves. Often, it can evoke emotions that come from layers and layers of defenses. For this, I would have to agree with him. Art is a beautiful expression of what we can not express otherwise.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: